In today’s technologically advanced world, artificial intelligence (AI) has become ubiquitous, penetrating numerous domains and revolutionising various industries.
Curious about its capabilities in typography, I embarked on a journey to uncover AI’s magic in font pairing.
While exploring, I stumbled upon Monotype’s AI-powered font pair generator—an intriguing tool that piqued my interest.
Does AI genuinely drive this tool? Can it actually produce impressive font pairings?
To satisfy my curiosity, I decided to put the font pair generator to the test. The tool itself proved to be remarkably user-friendly. All one needs to do is select a font, either for the title or the body text, and the generator will generate complementary pairings based on the chosen font. For my experiment, I opted for Gilroy, the font I currently utilise on my website.
With Gilroy as my starting point, the AI-generated suggestions began to materialise before me. Four font pairings emerged from the depths of the generator’s computational prowess. However, upon careful evaluation, only two pairings caught my eye, as they harmoniously blended with Gilroy’s style. Interestingly, both pairs featured a combination of slab serif fonts. On the other hand, the remaining suggestions incorporated classical-style fonts that proved unsuitable for body text purposes.
Ideally, I would like the ability to specify the font classifications I wish to integrate. For instance, I might want to avoid slab serif or classical-style fonts altogether. In an ideal AI scenario, I could provide a prompt like “Generate a font pairing suitable for a website belonging to a female author specializing in motherhood topics. The pairing should exude a modern and candid feel.” Subsequently, the AI-powered tool would provide several tailored suggestions aligning with my specific requirements.
It is crucial to contemplate whether the current iteration of such a tool truly warrants the title of AI. The aforementioned expectations of customization and contextual understanding are features that would elevate the tool’s capabilities to a genuinely intelligent level. As we ponder the boundaries of AI, we are left questioning whether a tool that lacks these advanced attributes can genuinely be deemed AI. The essence of true AI lies in its ability to comprehend contextual nuances, interpret prompts, and generate responses that align with the user’s specific desires.
In conclusion, while Monotype’s AI-powered font pair generator exhibits potential and delivers some promising results, it falls short of meeting the comprehensive customization and contextually driven criteria that define true AI. The quest for an AI-powered tool capable of crafting font pairings tailored to specific themes, styles, and target audiences remains an ongoing endeavour. As technology advances and AI algorithms continue to evolve, it is only a matter of time before we witness the emergence of a font pair generator that harnesses the true potential of artificial intelligence.